Recent content by rlm

I don't really care about what posts have or haven't been made. I'm just thinking his account should be frozen, if it already hasn't been.

The evidence seems pretty overwhelming that Yusuf's rights here should be revoked.

$100,000 sale @ 25% normal commission would be $25K commission. 40% off of 25K normal commission would be = 0.40 * $25,000 = $10,000 off. $10,000 off of $25,000 = $15,000 discounted commission. Therefore the discounted $15,000 commission is 40% off of the normal $25,000 commission. I still...

He screwed himself, a bit of a nutjob who was seeking out nutjobs to do business with. Pretty much predictable and inevitable.

Just a bit longer than a month.

That was my first time working with him, so I have to give him kudos for convincing the buyer to pay full price + 20% more than they needed to, lol. But yes, even with a broker and all the arguments you can make to justify the price, often a buyer just doesn't have it. And sometimes they even...

I sold a domain where the price was listed on the landing page. Yet the buyer still went through a GoDaddy broker. I refused to negotiate $0.01 off the price and the broker worked his ass off to convince the buyer it was worth it - and they paid the full price that was listed on the landing...

Yeah, the only requirement for ICA membership is that you pay. It is a great organization, not sure how much if at all it helps .CA people, but if you invest in other TLDs, especially .com, I'd recommend being a member.

Definitely, on a Lamborghini it makes it worse, but I was more thinking if it was on a Kia or something, it might have been argument that he goes by that nickname.

This is parked in front of my accountant’s office (am i paying him too much???). not sure if it was a client or what. Anyways, it made me think of this dispute. I wonder if having a personalized plate like that would have been evidence in the respondant’s favor when arguing it was nickname...

that’s a negative.

I agree on all points. It was $1455 to be exact, pre-tax.

The problem I have with is is that we know that there is no such thing as free energy - it always has costs and consequences. So it makes me immediately think of quack-job scams.

That seems like potential tax fraud to me too. Godaddy's position needs to be clearly defined in every transaction as either the seller, or the broker, and that should be made clear to both the buyer and the seller, up front. Taxation would be potentially different for each. One issue with...

because they were hoping to be at the top of the pyramid. and the smart ones probably got out and sold to the schmucks at the bottom of the pyramid. Anyone still with an NFT - you are one of the schmucks.