boostcollective.ca tries to reverse hijack boostcollective.com (2 Viewing)

NewsBot

DN.ca
Joined
Jul 1, 2022
Topics
311
Posts
325
Likes
86
From
Toronto, ON
Country flag
Screenshot (83).png


A Canadian International Internet Dispute Resolution Centre panel has ruled (pdf) that Boost Collective Inc. tried to reverse domain name hijack BoostCollective.com.

Boost Collective Inc. is a Canadian company that helps music artists distribute their music. It uses the domain name boostcollective.ca.

Its owner really, really wants the matching .com. But that’s owned by a U.S. business that was formed before the Canadian company was founded.

Read the article: Covetous Canadian Company tries to hijack an upgrade from .Ca to .Com - Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News
 
  • Like
Reactions: rlm
Those who help file these cases know they don't have a chance at winning but they still waste everyone's time and money.

This was one of the worst:

Gibson Guitars nailed for reverse domain name hijacking​

In December 2012, Respondent issued a press release stating that it had acquired Tobias Insurance Group (“Tobias IG”), an insurance agency founded in 1973. The press release states:
“AssuredPartners, Inc. has completed a transaction for substantially all of the assets of Tobias Insurance Group, Inc. Tobias Insurance Group, Inc. will continue under its own name and its headquarters in Indianapolis, IN. Tobias is one of the largest independently owned commercial insurance brokerage businesses in the Midwest, serving clients both domestically and internationally, and will continue under the leadership of […]”.
“Founded in 1973, Tobias offers a comprehensive mix of insurance products and services, including property and casualty, surety, and employee benefits. Tobias works with a wide array of industries, with a strong focus on construction. This acquisition will strategically expand AssuredPartners footprint in the Midwest.”
The Panel agrees with Complainant that this Complaint never should have been brought. Moreover, once Respondent’s position became clear from the Response, Complainant should have sought to settle or withdraw the Complaint. Instead, Complainant doubled down with irrelevant arguments. Complainant, represented by counsel with experience in UDRP cases, has committed Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (“RDNH”).
Gibson Guitars nailed for reverse domain name hijacking - Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News
 

Members who recently read this topic: 2

Sponsors who contribute to keep dn.ca free for everyone.

Sponsors who contribute to keep dn.ca free.

Back