Google displaying a skewed definition of "cybersquatting"? (1.Viewing)

WHC-FMWHC-FM is verified member.

WHC.ca
Service Representative
Joined
Nov 20, 2020
Topics
88
Posts
1,523
Likes
1,072
From
Montreal, QC
Country flag
I was surprised to read this definition of "cybersquatting" on Google, which seems to include registering domains for resale by itself rather than just those that infringe on the rights of third parties.

1696170919460.png



So I went to Google (feedback link at the bottom) and to Oxford Languages (link at the top) and asked for a correction and would encourage you to do the same.

1696171048015.png

1696171120580.png
 
Done, and these "experts" are clearly drooling idiots.

Wikipedia is a lot better, as it doesn't even mention the "reselling at a profit" that the slack-jawed, Reddit-approved Oxford definition is so fixated on:

Cybersquatting is the practice of registering, trafficking in, or using an Internet domain name, with a bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else.
 

Sponsors who contribute to keep dn.ca free for everyone.

Sponsors who contribute to keep dn.ca free.

Back
Top Bottom