Slots.net UDRP Denied (1.Viewing)

1. The Parties
Complainant is Novomatic AG, Austria, represented by GEISTWERT Kletzer Messner Mosing Schnider
Schultes Rechtsanwälte OG, Austria.
Respondent is DomainClip Domains Inc, Canada, represented by Gowling WLG LLP, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <slots.net> is registered with Safenames Ltd. (the “Registrar”).

Click to expand...

Respondent also owns Slots.ca domain
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/pdf/2022/d2022-4590.pdf

It doesn't take a legal genius to know this is an absurd dispute at face value. It should have been a clear case of RDNH.

Brad

Yeah, why wasn't this a RDNH?

I just read it and although the obvious decision was correctly made (duh!) the reasons for not finding an RDNH are truly bizarre and I wonder if this panelist even has even a tenuous grasp of the English language. Either that or....

She essentially said "all the complainant's false and concocted reasons for bringing this UDRP do not fall under the category of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking."

Huh? I don't think that means what she think it means.