If you're a domain investor you're definitely leaving money on the table. A story about price sensitivity...
1/7
For those of you who don't know, NameBio's sister company owns more than 70k domains. We BIN price all of them, and to do this initially we grouped them into seven price buckets based on GoValue, DotDB, and other metrics. 2/7
The bottom 30% of the portfolio was priced into three buckets: $1795 (20%), $1295 (5%), and $995 (5%). After three months of testing, this group of names was contributing 14% to our total sales by quantity. 3/7
As an experiment, for the next three months we combined those buckets into a single price point: $2195. Logically we were expecting fewer sales, but we wanted to see if the higher price could more than offset the decrease in STR. 4/7
But something shocking happened... the number of sales didn't decrease. The bucket was still contributing 14% to our total sales by quantity, except now it was contributing 38% more to our gross revenue. 5/7
Darpan noticed the same thing a few months later, that there is almost zero price elasticity at <$2k:
Direct link to post on X.com
(Every domain investor should be following @darpanmunjal by the way, he regularly provides brilliant and actionable insights.)6/7
That means a name priced at $500 has basically the same chance of selling if priced at $2,000. If you're pricing names below $2k - $2.5k, raise your prices up to that level. You shouldn't experience a meaningful drop in STR and you'll make more money. 7/7