silentg
That response from GoDaddy was Nov 27
This is Epik pleading with GoDaddy a month later
That response from GoDaddy was Nov 27
This is Epik pleading with GoDaddy a month later
I did not see that tweet because Epik blocked me. The truth hurts I guess.To me it appears Epik is owning up to their error and genuinely trying to help with the delay being godaddy.
I know what the domain is (Dan's a good friend) and it needs to come back to him. Teh domain is running a live site and hosted on godaddy with both Epik and Dan having provided all the details to GoDaddy. The ball is only in one court at this time and it seems like the case is not being elevated at the GoDaddy end.
This is not good PR for GoDaddy and the best solution here would be for GoDaddy to assign it a priority of some kind.
@jamesiles is there anything you can do to elevate this?
I did not see that tweet because Epik blocked me. The truth hurts I guess.
Some entity that is not a registrar is taking ownership of their mistakes. It's not all that meaningful.Yup but they are taking full ownership of their mistakes RECENTLY
Announce the domain, it's like posting a sale on twitter with no details, nobody takes it seriously without facts
ChampionshipRings.com is the stolen domain nameAnnounce the domain, it's like posting a sale on twitter with no details, nobody takes it seriously without facts.
There may have been un unwitting purchased however there is no such thing as a "legitimate" transfer of stolen propertyI think what likely happened is after the unauthorized transfer, the domain probably changed hands via some legitimate transaction.
I doubt the current owner is the party that actually stole the domain.
This entire thing is Epik's fault.
If the transfer was unauthorized, the domain should be returned to the rightful owner.
Assuming the current owner was not part of the unauthorized transfer, they should be compensated by Epik. It is not right that they should take the loss for Epik's incompetence.
Brad
There may have been un unwitting purchased however there is no such thing as a "legitimate" transfer of stolen property
If a GoDaddy service (afternic) itself was used to sell the domain name to the NEW UNSUSPECTING owner, you can see the tremendous conflict of interest between a registrar and a reseller. Then combine that with the fact GoDaddy is also selling them web hosting and this entire thing becomes one hell of a clust f**k
I agree.There may have been un unwitting purchased however there is no such thing as a "legitimate" transfer of stolen property
I am no GoDaddy defender. I have had many issues with them.