Not so accurate on .ca's but very unusual to show a range like in the pure example.
PS. The two domains I listed will be held in my portfolio until an LLC company or similar wants them and will not be sold for less than 1.25 million each.
I figure they should sell at minimum 10% value to the .com
I was randomly checking domains while watching some TV last night. Found a couple that showed ">$100,000" for a .ca. They are nice domains, but not necessarily ones that I'd expect six-figs for - while the ones I would expect six-figs for where much less. As always, to be taken with a grain of salt.
In any case, the interesting point I meant to make here was that apparently Saw tops out at $100,000 for .CA domains and just says "greater than" for above that. You can see what I mean by checking "whales".
I was randomly checking domains while watching some TV last night. Found a couple that showed ">$100,000" for a .ca. They are nice domains, but not necessarily ones that I'd expect six-figs for - while the ones I would expect six-figs for where much less. As always, to be taken with a grain of salt.
In any case, the interesting point I meant to make here was that apparently Saw tops out at $100,000 for .CA domains and just says "greater than" for above that. You can see what I mean by checking "whales".
The only one of mine I punched in that came up to that
I have a number of more valuable domains that appraise at much less.
Pure.ca comes out at 25k and I consider that one of my best .ca domains and I value it way above holidays.ca
Not so accurate on .ca's but very unusual to show a range like in the pure example.
PS. The two domains I listed will be held in my portfolio until an LLC company or similar wants them and will not be sold for less than 1.25 million each.
I figure they should sell at minimum 10% value to the .com