She is not the only one that has a strong portfolio of .XYZ, just the largest most public one.
New account, not unsuspended
these sales were already publicly reported to NameBio and on NamePros. Nikul is just resharing it.
SWETHA IS COMING OUT OF THE SHADOWS?
So after 7 long years of waiting—light a candle—we’ve finally been blessed with a Twitter Space,
because Swetha has decided to grace us with her voice.
Unfortunately (and predictably), I don’t think this will do much to clear up the swirling cloud of mystery and skepticism around her. Why?
First off, we still won’t see who’s actually behind the microphone. No video. Nothing.
I mean, in 2025, with Zoom, FaceTime, YouTube, AI deepfakes—you name it—she chooses audio-only?
If you're trying to prove you're real, why not at least show up as a blurry silhouette in low light?
Give us something.
Then there’s the tiny issue of the 20,000+ one-word .xyz domains she supposedly owns.
Just because someone hops into a Space and talks for five minutes doesn’t magically prove ownership.
For all we know, it can be the .xyz registry’s customer support intern doing voiceover work.
And even if she does speak, how exactly does that verify that her “sales” aren’t just fantasy league trades?
Spoiler: it doesn’t.
Also, based on her tweets, I fully expect her to speak with flawless, native-level American English—
slang, rhythm, sarcasm, the whole deal.
Not a trace of ESL. If she suddenly sounds like Siri on Ambien,
that’s going to be… interesting.
Now, just to be clear—we’re not doubting her out of jealousy, boredom, or some deep-rooted vendetta against unicorn domainers.
The skepticism is entirely her own doing. She built this mystery castle, furnished it, and locked the doors.
And let’s be honest: no one in her situation behaves like a full-blown ghost—unless they have something to hide.
She wants the fame and glory of being a "star domainer"—tweet likes, news, reports, articles, namebio, community worship—but wants to stay hidden in the shadows like Batman?
C’mon. If she’s legit, it makes zero sense. If she’s not… then suddenly it makes a lot of sense.
So, what do you think? Would hearing someone claiming to be Swetha in a Twitter Space will change your mind?
Or are we still living in the domain version of Scooby-Doo?
When I logged into Swetha's Afternic account 2.5 years ago and saw her sales with my own eyes, I really thought that was going to be the end to all of this nonsense. Now here I am feeling the need to comment on some of the latest "evidence"...
Her Sales Don't Get Developed
This is simply not true. I looked at the last 50 reported sales of 2024 for both
@mikemanndotcom
and
@swethayenugula
. This period should give enough time for development, while also not so much time that sites could have likely launched and then shuttered.
I'll post the full results in a comment for transparency, but to summarize Mike vs Swetha:
Developed: 23 vs 23
Forwarded: 6 vs 1
Coming Soon: 2 vs 3
Doesn't Resolve: 14 vs 11
Registrar/Hosting Lander: 5 vs 10
For Sale: 0 vs 2
Her X Account Was Suspended
Some claim Swetha's X suspension is evidence of fraud, but this doesn't add up. X isn't investigating domain sales — they lack the industry knowledge, connections, and access to do that. They're not the SEC or the FBI, let's be serious. Suspensions often stem from mass reports. Her haters would never do that though, right?
Right???
Or maybe it's an unrelated policy violation. Without specific details from X, this is irrelevant to her sales.
Further Discussion
Well, let's be honest, further discussion is kind of pointless. Short of a confession I don't think we'll ever know with certainty one way or another.
No amount of logic or evidence is going to sway people who have already made up their minds and are willing to constantly shift the goal-posts to cling to their half-baked theories.
No matter the development — whether Swetha proves sales through platforms like Afternic, appears on a podcast or space, undergoes a financial audit — haters will pivot to new theories, from alleging wash sales and money laundering to calling her a paid actress and dreaming up a web of untraceable shell companies.
Now they're having Grok do linguistic analysis to determine if her posts are written by a human. It would almost be comical if there weren't a real person involved. Instead it's just sad and disgraceful.
Where's the "dump" of the "pump and dump"? She isn't wholesaling at scale and is still buying after so many years. There isn't some hype wave of people registering XYZ hoping to flip them for insane profits, enriching the registry in the process.
Other very well-known investors are getting sales at similar levels. The domains are getting developed at similar rates to other sellers.
There are much cheaper ways to fake sales than washing them through high-commission marketplaces. Literally none of it makes any sense.
If you have some actual hard evidence post it. There's a big difference between urging caution for newer investors, and throwing around baseless accusations to feed an addiction to drama and bullying. Make sure your delivery matches your intentions.
I'd rather have a community that celebrates success than one that lashes out in fear and extreme paranoia.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
