Tracking is out of control! (2.Viewing)

If true, it's some scary shit

Most likely total b.s.

rlm said:

Most likely total b.s.

Click to expand...

I've never even had a walmart send me a request to review a product.

My wife watches a lot of crime shows and many people get busted for murder and the video evidence of them buying a carving-knife, heavy duty garbage bags and bleach right after a murder helps convict them. So if Walmart is actually doing that at some stores, I don't have a problem with it. If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to worry about.

And how many people are stealing at the self checkout counter? I think it's walmart's right to hunt down perps with their own tech since the gov't doesn't give a f*ck. And hopefully they can start using the tech to deny those people entry into their stores. That may be the biggest possible deterrence, to be banned from entering a walmart ever again??

To be honest, I wish security cameras were better and that the govt would start making criminal punishments harsh enough to actually deter crime. Then maybe I wouldn't have to feel fine with giving up my privacy to help solve crimes. But that's the reality of the situation these days.

rlm said:

To be honest, I wish security cameras were better and that the govt would start making criminal punishments harsh enough to actually deter crime.

Click to expand...

Good luck with that.

I was reading about a previous offender who got convicted for multiple rapes (they literally caught him in the act) and while the Crown asked for 10 years, the judge gave him house arrest, along with a pile of limits and requirements he needed to adhere to, otherwise "he would almost certainly go back to jail".

Of course Mr House Arrest proceeded to break those rules multiple times, being barely at home, was photographed in bars, strip joints, drinking, doing drugs, and hanging out with criminal friends. A laundry list of probation violation reports landed him back in front of the judge multiple times... and he still didn't get sent to jail.

I often wonder what it takes to get a jail sentence from a Liberal judge.

DomainRecap said:

Good luck with that.

I was reading about a previous offender who got convicted for multiple rapes (they literally caught him in the act) and while the Crown asked for 10 years, the judge gave him house arrest, along with a pile of limits and requirements he needed to adhere to, otherwise "he would almost certainly go back to jail".

Of course Mr House Arrest proceeded to break those rules multiple times, being barely at home, was photographed in bars, strip joints, drinking, doing drugs, and hanging out with criminal friends. A laundry list of probation violation reports landed him back in front of the judge multiple times... and he still didn't get sent to jail.

I often wonder what it takes to get a jail sentence from a Liberal judge.

Click to expand...

Yes, this is the real problem, a soft society that sympathizes with criminals - and of course the useless judicial system that is more afraid of infringing on a criminals rights than upholding citizens rights. These stories are everywhere. In some areas of the states, judges are elected and at least there the people have a say in the matter. Here the people have no say. Judges who make these decisions should be brought up on charges of aiding and abetting.

This is big in the news where I live:

Bailey McCourt, a 32-year-old a mother of two, was killed in a Kelowna parking lot last July. McCourt's estranged husband, James Plover, who was convicted of assault and released from court pending sentencing just hours before her death, has been charged with first-degree murder.

The lack of common sense in the judicial system is just astounding.

rlm said:

Yes, this is the real problem, a soft society that sympathizes with criminals - and of course the useless judicial system that is more afraid of infringing on a criminals rights than upholding citizens rights.

Click to expand...

It goes a lot deeper than that.

We all know that Indigenous perps get much lower sentences (if they even get jail time) due to the hardships they went through, residential schools, drug use, family life, blah, blah, blah, but what about the rights of Indigenous victims who went through the same crap? One Indigenous lady was strung up with a phone cord and left to die, yet her Indigenous assailant was given a very lenient sentence due to the above reasons, but what about this poor Inuit woman? I bet her life was no picnic, yet she gets absolutely no voice.

The whole system is screwed up beyond belief.

According to Grok there is truth to this