Should expired domains be treated like abandoned or intellectual property? (2.Viewing)

Right now, when a domain expires, it enters a system that treats it basically like abandoned property. It gets auctioned, recycled, or picked up by whoever's fastest.
But a lot of people argue that domains, especially branded ones, feel more like intellectual property.

So what's the right way to think about it?
Should they have some kind of IP-style protection, even after expiration?
Where's the line between "fair market process"and "digital identity hijacking"?

If its intellectual property, just renew it. That's the safest and cheapest way to protect it if you think it is IP worth protecting.

When a domain name expires, it isn’t awarded by auction to whoever is fastest. For example, at NameSilo, the original owner still has a 30-day grace period to renew the domain, even if there are active bids on it.

rlm said:

If its intellectual property, just renew it. That's the safest and cheapest way to protect it if you think it is IP worth protecting.

Click to expand...

Yeah, renewing is a solid baseline, and many people use that time to observe how a name naturally gains meaning or relevance.

leonid said:

When a domain name expires, it isn’t awarded by auction to whoever is fastest. For example, at NameSilo, the original owner still has a 30-day grace period to renew the domain, even if there are active bids on it.

Click to expand...

Yeah, bidders still deal with uncertainty and time costs, which influences how expired auctions really play out.