Why the Rams.com UDRP Loss Matters More Than Most Panel Decisions (2.Viewing)

WEST PALM BEACH, FL – For more than two decades, domain-name disputes have been guided by a widely accepted principle: when a domain registrant attempts to sell a domain to a trademark owner for a substantial sum, that offer is often treated as evidence of bad-faith registration. The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) expressly identifies this type of conduct as a hallmark of cybersquatting.

Yet a recent decision involving Los Angeles Rams and the ultra-premium domain Rams.com cuts sharply against the way many brand owners, and even some investors, assume UDRP panels operate.

The ruling is more than a routine loss for a sports franchise. It is a reminder that context, timing, and the inherent nature of a domain name still matter, even in an era where trademark enforcement has become increasingly aggressive.

Read more: Why the Rams.com UDRP Loss Matters More Than Most Panel Decisions | Strategic Revenue - Domain and Internet News

Almost gave me a heart attack with that title

Well I guess it's accurate because the LA Rams lost but I would have preffered it to read:

Why the Rams.com UDRP DENIAL Matters More Than Most Panel Decisions​

This was exactly my point I made earlier, I can almost guarantee this will be cited in future disputes.

rlm said:

This was exactly my point I made earlier, I can almost guarantee this will be cited in future disputes.

Click to expand...

As much as I would like to forget this episode I too have a feeling it will come up in future discussions.

rlm said:

This was exactly my point I made earlier, I can almost guarantee this will be cited in future disputes.

Click to expand...

Already done, I'm incorporating it into an defense as we speak.