CDRP What is the specific process of CDRP? (9.Viewing)

  • Topic Starter Topic Starter Hugh
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 7
  • Views Views: Views 35

Hugh

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2026
Topics
1
Posts
8
Likes
7
Country flag
Hi everyone,

I’m looking for some insight into the .ca (CDRP) arbitration process. I recently received a "cease and desist" style threat from a company regarding one of my .ca domains. They offered me $100 to transfer the domain, claiming that if I don't accept, they will initiate arbitration.

I’ve been through a UDRP for a .com domain before, but I’m new to the CIRA/CDRP rules. I have no intention of handing over the domain for $100, as I believe I have a legitimate interest in it.

I’d appreciate any experiences you can share regarding .ca disputes! Thanks in advance.
 
I've been through it a few times, and have prevented many others from ever getting to CDRP. It would be a better private discussion since giving you any advice would require knowing the domain in question as every situation is different. If you want to talk, feel free to PM me and we can do a phone call. I just hate to see bullies succeed, so I'm happy to help.
 
First question is do you have a Canadian presence of some kind, if the answer to that is yes then everything else falls into place.

Like rlm says, it's highly defendant on the domain, some are easier to defend than others.
 
Thanks rlm @rlm and MapleDots @MapleDots!

About presence: I am not a Canadian citizen, but I own a Canadian corporation that I use to hold my .ca domains. I hope this structure satisfies CIRA's Presence Requirements.

I’m actually quite familiar with the UDRP process as I manage a large portfolio and have dealt with disputes before. In my experience, UDRP panelists can often be quite "complainant-friendly" (biased).

In your opinion, is the CDRP process generally more balanced or registrant-friendly compared to the UDRP?

Thanks again for the insights.
 
i think cdrp is pretty fair to registrants, but you have to fight back, and if it goes to cdrp you have to get a panel instead of single a single panelist so you don’t get screwed by one rogue person. often the best strategy is to prevent it from going that far by letting them know you won’t roll over. ive scared off many threats from ever filing.
 
i think cdrp is pretty fair to registrants, but you have to fight back, and if it goes to cdrp you have to get a panel instead of single a single panelist so you don’t get screwed by one rogue person. often the best strategy is to prevent it from going that far by letting them know you won’t roll over. ive scared off many threats from ever filing.
Thanks for the reply! I take every dispute very seriously and put a lot of effort into my response for every domain (win or lose). I really despise those brand protection agencies that encourage companies to file for arbitration just to generate fees. I actually had a previous UDRP case where the panel ruled that the complainant and the agency engaged in Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH). That was a very satisfying win!
 
btw a canadian corporation would satisfy, but make sure right now that the domain is in the corporation name (be exact), and not your personal name as Registrant.
Yes, all domain names are held in the company's name.
 

Sponsors who contribute to keep dn.ca free for everyone.

Sponsors who contribute to keep dn.ca free.

Back