icannpigeon
Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2026
- Topics
- 2
- Posts
- 4
- Likes
- 0
I got approached by someone overseas asking if I could hold a .ca domain for them as a "trustee", so it works in a way that they'd pay me to be listed as the WHOIS registrant while they run the show.
I turned it down, but curious if anyone here has looked into this closely.
From what I can tell, CIRA explicitly bans this under Section 4.1(g) of the Registrant Agreement; you can't register or hold a domain on behalf of a third party, for money or otherwise, unless they independently qualify under the Canadian Presence Requirements or are an actual affiliate of yours (think parent/subsidiary, not just a paid contract). A pure payment-for-service arrangement with no real ownership or governance relationship doesn't cut it.
https://www.cira.ca/uploads/2025/08/Registrant-Agreement-Version-2.3-August-1-2025.pdf
And the consequences may be domain cancellation, up to a 3-year ban on new .ca registrations, and potential termination of your registrant agreement altogether. A shell company existing only to hold a domain on their behalf probably won't survive an RIV audit either.
Anyone dealt with similar requests? Am I reading the policy right?
Sorry
@MapleDots ! I should have posted it under the "CIRA & Legal" gategory!
I turned it down, but curious if anyone here has looked into this closely.
From what I can tell, CIRA explicitly bans this under Section 4.1(g) of the Registrant Agreement; you can't register or hold a domain on behalf of a third party, for money or otherwise, unless they independently qualify under the Canadian Presence Requirements or are an actual affiliate of yours (think parent/subsidiary, not just a paid contract). A pure payment-for-service arrangement with no real ownership or governance relationship doesn't cut it.
https://www.cira.ca/uploads/2025/08/Registrant-Agreement-Version-2.3-August-1-2025.pdf
And the consequences may be domain cancellation, up to a 3-year ban on new .ca registrations, and potential termination of your registrant agreement altogether. A shell company existing only to hold a domain on their behalf probably won't survive an RIV audit either.
Anyone dealt with similar requests? Am I reading the policy right?
Sorry
Last edited:







