Company gets $50,000 in statutory damages per domain.
Verizon wins $450k cybersquatting judgment - Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News
Verizon wins $450k cybersquatting judgment - Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News
One of his websites is still active... verizontrademarkservices.com
You don't poke the bear!
When you've had that, check out the defendant's website:
Matt McMan
Yup his fair-use disclaimer aged well in court
Yeah, what is the angle?I can't figure out what this Matt guy's end-game was. Unless he's just incredibly stupid, which I doubt. If I had to guess, I would guess he had some petty grievance against Verizon (real or imaginary) and this was how he sought 'revenge' ... which did not exactly work out well for him. Dude, seriously? Reminds me a bit of a conspiracy theorist nutter from years ago who would occasionally blast out emails to dozens of folks in the domain industry alleging all sorts of nefarious crimes committed by ICANN. Haven't heard from that nutter in a few years, thankfully. I might have bozo-filtered his email address, though, and perhaps he's still out there doing his thing.
Its also possible that he got lucky with this strategy before and has gotten a little cocky and doubled down by doing it again. I've seen people do similar stupid things just because they got lucky once.I can't figure out what this Matt guy's end-game was. Unless he's just incredibly stupid, which I doubt. If I had to guess, I would guess he had some petty grievance against Verizon (real or imaginary) and this was how he sought 'revenge' ... which did not exactly work out well for him. Dude, seriously? Reminds me a bit of a conspiracy theorist nutter from years ago who would occasionally blast out emails to dozens of folks in the domain industry alleging all sorts of nefarious crimes committed by ICANN. Haven't heard from that nutter in a few years, thankfully. I might have bozo-filtered his email address, though, and perhaps he's still out there doing his thing.