Well I don’t think that’s right personally. If it’s not registered within the TBR timeframe they should not be charging $20.
I think the issue with TBR and the advantage some get is the fact they are able to get unlimited connections. It is tough to compete with WHC and myID for that reason.
Agreed. But remember last year? I went through this exact scenario with WHC, I thought they should refund the money out of principle when they screwed up the TBR run and then successfully reg'd them post-tbr, and still charged TBR prices (and possibly still auctioned them off, can't remember).
It was my opinion then that WHC should have refunded the difference, just on principle, since that is not how TBR is designed to work. The main problem I had with it was that it would establish the precedent that registrars could now reg domains any time they like, then still auction them off.
CIRA's opinion was that I was stretching, that WHC wasn't doing anything devious, just trying to cover up a mistake when they mucked up the TBR run and that since we asked them to try and get it, they were doing their best to do so. I definitely get that perspective, and wasn't really accusing them of doing anything bad.
I just didn't want them to set the precedent that it was OK for any registrar to do that in the future. I felt that if you couldn't reg it during the TBR period, you shouldn't even be trying after, that's not what I contracted them to do.
I thought maybe WHC would have just refunded the difference, just to prove that no registrar should be doing this and that they would want to show that they weren't going to be the one that set that precedent. You know, simply out of principle, show some integrity at nearly nil cost. I thought that for the sake of $10 it was a great marketing move. In fact, I was purposely tee-ing it up for them with the opportunity to knock it out of the park from the integrity standpoint.
I was wrong, WHC chose not to do anything.