Heavyweight Twitter Debate Happening Today (3.Viewing)

  • Topic Starter Topic Starter Esdiel
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 23
  • Views Views: Views 4,227
Esdiel

Esdiel

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2020
Topics
134
Posts
1,193
Likes
1,006
Country flag
Some heavyweights in the domain community are having somewhat of a heated debate on Twitter today.

If you dig in the comments you'll see they get into a number of things:

https://twitter.com/Berryhillj/status/1347924872928833536

Here's a glimpse:

Screen-Shot-2021-01-09-at-2-39-17-PM.png
 
Actually, FreeSpeech.com was launched in early 2019, not recently. [back when I was banned from ICANN working group's for calling out a lawyer who was on the losing side of a UDRP]

Today's debate was ultimately about censorship and free speech, i.e. the whole debate brought on by Twitter's decision to permanently ban Donald Trump.

As for Berryhill's initial tweet, I have absolutely no idea what he's talking about in regards to some alleged lawsuit against Rick Schwartz's associates. That was bizarre! Even Rick (who I emailed today) had no idea what Berryhill is talking about, and when pressed, Berryhill couldn't identify such a lawsuit.
 
In order to put the issue to rest, I challenged Berryhill to produce the evidence of the lawsuit tonight, with me being a plaintifff against one of Rick Schwartz's associates:

https://twitter.com/GeorgeKirikos/status/1348051183022333952

If he can produce it, I'll donate $100,000 *each* to EFF and to ICA.

Of course, that lawsuit doesn't actually exist, so my money is safe. But, now the burden has shifted to Berryhill to provide evidence of that lawsuit or back off from his statement.
 
Indeed, he must be suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome or something! O:)

If anyone actually *believes* I sued one of Rick's associates, then ask Berryhill to produce the evidence (court records are public), and both ICA and EFF will be $100,000 richer! What happens if Berryhill *can't* produce that evidence? A lawyer shown to be making recklessly false statements of that nature? I leave it to you to decide how you would treat such a lawyer.

If I was an ICA member, I'd be begging Berryhill to produce the evidence, so that the ICA can get $100,000. Why is Berryhill denying them that money, if what Berryhill is saying is true??!!??
 
Login or Register to reply

Sponsors who contribute to keep dn.ca free for everyone.

Sponsor
CanSpace
CIRA
FullHost
WHC
Donors

Sponsors who contribute to keep dn.ca free.

Members who recently read this topic: 2

Back
Top Bottom