UDRP LA Rams vs MapleDots | RAMS.com UDRP Dispute Denied (19.Viewing)

@MapleDots any plans to buy the .ca?

RedRider said:

@MapleDots any plans to buy the .ca?

Click to expand...

No

I'm working on a UDRP myself and the case comes up all over Google and X - great informative post

rams trademark



https://trademarks.justia.com/789/59/rams-78959375.html

Doesn't say generic four letter domain name anywhere in the trademark

It is a pretty common practice for TM holders who don’t want to pay for the domain to try to gain access to it through a UDRP. This is not the first time and it won’t be the last. There are many companies out there that just won’t pay. The fact a domain goes into UDRP is a sign they probably will never purchase the domain either.

I think they gave it a shot hoping that because there was contact that would be enough to secure the domain. They failed. They will move on. They’ve managed for this long and many others do the same also. I think we tend to believe these companies really need our domains but in a lot of cases they can do without. Which is why greed should not become a factor when selling a domain name. You should have a price in mind and that’s it. That lottery ticket type of mindset doesn’t succeed.

theinvestor said:

The fact a domain goes into UDRP is a sign they probably will never purchase the domain either.

Click to expand...

I got a 2.25 million dollar offers two days after the UDRP concluded, unfortunately the price has gone up, I will no longer consider that price range.


The moment the WIPO decision came down, RAMS.com became a different asset.

Before:
– Risk-adjusted
– Litigation-exposed
– Discounted by fear

After:
– Clean
– Defensible
– Institutional-grade


“$2.5M was the price for RAMS.com with risk of a doomed UDRP.
Now we’re talking about RAMS.com without risk.”

Those are two different products.