UDRP LA Rams vs MapleDots | RAMS.com UDRP Dispute Denied (2.Viewing)

ramssale.png


MapleDots @MapleDots any plans to buy the .ca?
 
I'm working on a UDRP myself and the case comes up all over Google and X - great informative post



research8.png
 
It is a pretty common practice for TM holders who don’t want to pay for the domain to try to gain access to it through a UDRP. This is not the first time and it won’t be the last. There are many companies out there that just won’t pay. The fact a domain goes into UDRP is a sign they probably will never purchase the domain either.

I think they gave it a shot hoping that because there was contact that would be enough to secure the domain. They failed. They will move on. They’ve managed for this long and many others do the same also. I think we tend to believe these companies really need our domains but in a lot of cases they can do without. Which is why greed should not become a factor when selling a domain name. You should have a price in mind and that’s it. That lottery ticket type of mindset doesn’t succeed.
 
The fact a domain goes into UDRP is a sign they probably will never purchase the domain either.

I got a 2.25 million dollar offers two days after the UDRP concluded, unfortunately the price has gone up, I will no longer consider that price range.


The moment the WIPO decision came down, RAMS.com became a different asset.

Before:
– Risk-adjusted
– Litigation-exposed
– Discounted by fear

After:
– Clean
– Defensible
– Institutional-grade


“$2.5M was the price for RAMS.com with risk of a doomed UDRP.
Now we’re talking about RAMS.com without risk.”

Those are two different products.
 
Last edited:
I got a 2.25 million dollar offers two days after the UDRP concluded, unfortunately the price has gone up, I will no longer consider that price range.

According to the UDRP you were asking 3.5 million before the UDRP. Would you consider that today?
 
rams.webp


Sports mogul Stan Kroenke becomes America's biggest private landowner in massive secret deal​

LA Rams owner now controls more land than Ted Turner and John Malone after New Mexico purchase​


A billionaire sports and real estate magnate has quietly completed the largest private land purchase in the United States in more than a decade — propelling him past other moguls to the top of the nation’s private landownership rankings.

Stan Kroenke — who owns the NFL’s Los Angeles Rams and England’s Premier League club Arsenal — purchased more than 937,000 acres of ranchland in New Mexico in a major off-market deal for property once owned by the heirs of Teledyne founder Dr. Henry Singleton, The Land Report first reported.

The acquisition catapulted Kroenke from No. 4 to No. 1 on the 2025 Land Report 100, surpassing other billionaire landowners such as Ted Turner and John Malone. It also marked the largest single land transaction in the United States in more than a decade. Financial terms were not disclosed by either party.

Sports mogul Stan Kroenke becomes America's biggest private landowner in massive secret deal
 
Stan Kroenke is old school and doesn't have the smarts to understand the importance of a domain name.
 
Amazing what you can buy when you marry a Walmart heiress.

Stan Kroenke married Ann Walton, a Walmart heiress and daughter of Bud Walton (Walmart co-founder), in 1974, which connected him to the retail giant's vast fortune and real estate opportunities, enabling his own sports and property empire. His marriage to Ann, who inherited significant Walmart stock, provided the foundation for his massive real estate developments and his subsequent sports team ownership.

Yes, he's a real "self-made" man. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 

Sponsors who contribute to keep dn.ca free for everyone.

Sponsors who contribute to keep dn.ca free.

Back