DomainRecap said:
Of course the lazy ones who stumble out of bed at 1:30PM every Wednesday would love it, but I doubt the deep-divers who provide this important data are all that appreciative.
I agree, I hate it too. However, Sibername has already always done this anyways, so its not any different - other than the "hot" flags set by staff. And lets face it, the staff aren't always going to be very good with their picks. I see some of CIRA's picks and have to chuckle some times.
And I suspect that WHC will quickly realize they don't really need to publish their hot picks because that just means its work on their end. And they're not going to be very good at it unless someone spends a decent amount of time doing their research like we do. And considering our bids quickly overwhelm the hot-picks anyways, I don't think they'll put too much effort into it long term. If they do, I suspect it'll just be some automated flagging of their hot picks.
But guys who work hard to research of course are going to hate that it's made easy for the lazy. That motivates the researchers to not put their bids in until the last second to avoid giving away their hard work for free.
However, as a registrar, I get that they want to encourage _everyone_ to know about _every_ decent domain and get as many people involved in the auctions as possible. I mean it would be silly from their perspective not to.
So I'm definitely torn on this one. You can look at it two ways:
1. You're being bent over and screwed when they take your hard work and research and they publish it free to the public.
2. Its a public auction, so the pre-auction is no different than the post-auction. Bids are made public, simple as that.
So this argument has very valid perspectives from both sides.
In the end, as a bidder, there's two choices to combat that problem.
1. only place bids at the last second.
2. quit bidding with them.
As hardcore researchers, I don't think we're ever going to win this one. If I'm concerned about grabbing something under the radar, I have to go with option 1.